Questions that the @ COVIDSelect has not asked
To Anthony Fauci:
Why did you authorize in vivo Gain of Function research at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill by Ralph Baric during the Gain of Function moratorium in October 2014?
Why did the Department of Health and Human Services transfer ownership of Ralph Baric’s “Infectious, Replication Defective Clone of Coronavirus” patent from UNC to the National Institutes of health over 1 year before the pandemic?
Why was Ralph Baric able to transfer the COVID “Vaccine” material to Moderna prior to the first patient reported in Wuhan?
Why was the Adverse Event Following Vaccine definition changed in 2018 to exclude adverse events that were not reported in the literature?
To Peter Daszak:
Why did you state?
To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis we need to increase public understanding of the need for MCMs (medical countermeasures) such as a pan-coronavirus vaccine . A key driver is the media, and the economics follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process ’.
- Peter Daszak, National Academy of Science March 2015
Developing MCMs for Coronaviruses - Rapid Medical Countermeasure Response to Infectious Diseases - NCBI Bookshelf (http://nih.gov).
To Ralph Baric:
When you presented at the DARPA MITRE conference in 2005 stating that synthetic coronavirus was a biowarfare enabling technology, why did you spend the next 15 years developing more lethal strains?
When you published your Gain of Function Research in 2016 on Coronavirus Poised for Human Emergence, why did you use the Wuhan Institute of Virology Virus 1 sequence for this research? And why haven’t you told the public the other sequences you’ve recreated from Wuhan since 2012?
How much money did you make on Remdesivir after knowing that it killed 53% of Ebola patients in the African clinical trials that the WHO determined to be unethical?
To Anthony Fauci:
Why did you authorize in vivo Gain of Function research at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill by Ralph Baric during the Gain of Function moratorium in October 2014?
Why did the Department of Health and Human Services transfer ownership of Ralph Baric’s “Infectious, Replication Defective Clone of Coronavirus” patent from UNC to the National Institutes of health over 1 year before the pandemic?
Why was Ralph Baric able to transfer the COVID “Vaccine” material to Moderna prior to the first patient reported in Wuhan?
Why was the Adverse Event Following Vaccine definition changed in 2018 to exclude adverse events that were not reported in the literature?
To Peter Daszak:
Why did you state?
To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis we need to increase public understanding of the need for MCMs (medical countermeasures) such as a pan-coronavirus vaccine . A key driver is the media, and the economics follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process ’.
- Peter Daszak, National Academy of Science March 2015
Developing MCMs for Coronaviruses - Rapid Medical Countermeasure Response to Infectious Diseases - NCBI Bookshelf (http://nih.gov).
To Ralph Baric:
When you presented at the DARPA MITRE conference in 2005 stating that synthetic coronavirus was a biowarfare enabling technology, why did you spend the next 15 years developing more lethal strains?
When you published your Gain of Function Research in 2016 on Coronavirus Poised for Human Emergence, why did you use the Wuhan Institute of Virology Virus 1 sequence for this research? And why haven’t you told the public the other sequences you’ve recreated from Wuhan since 2012?
How much money did you make on Remdesivir after knowing that it killed 53% of Ebola patients in the African clinical trials that the WHO determined to be unethical?