Bill Maher catches amnesia while actually trying to defend Jeffrey Epstein's buddy, Woody Allen and it doesn't go well.
"I respect the artist and the man. I don't think he committed that crime. All these actors who won't work with him anymore. What a bunch of pu**ies. It's a very improbable crime that they are accusing him of. First of all, I just flat out believe him. I believe a 57 year old man didn't suddenly become a child molester in the middle of a divorce proceeding in a house full of adults in broad daylight...

"Listen, I don't know but there was some pretty sketchy things and damning things in the documentary that certainly raised legitimate questions. He had a relationship with a high school student. Do you remember? Did you watch the documentary?"
Woody Allen married his step daughter, frequently hung out with Jeffrey Epstein, and his movies had plots where the main character, Woody, was dating a literal under age child. But I'm sure it's nothing.
Why is Bill Maher trying to defend Woody Allen when anyone with eyes can see he is clearly a predator?
X

This is so odd considering he recently called out Hollywood pedos saying it's a small world after all. I guess it's a small world unless your buddies are in it.

https://teleg.eu/realKarliBonne/239335

Hey frens, we're doing meme wars this Saturday morning.

Submit your favorite memes of the last week or so and we'll have some fun rating them 🙌🏻

We rate on 1) truth/accuracy, 2) how funny it is; and 3) how informative it is (red-pilling factor)

GM frens, happy Friday!!!

Aw, poor Schiffty Schiff 🍉😂
He had to attend a dinner without his suit because his luggage was stolen in San Francisco

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/thieves-snatch-rep-adam-schiff-s-luggage-in-s-f-he-gives-dinner-speech-without-a-suit/ar-AA1nGMqu#

MSM spin as usual, yet they think that Trump team had a good day in court.

"The resulting decision from the court will likely mean a narrowing of the Jan. 6 case against Trump based on whatever rule the majority devises for what official acts are fair game for prosecution."

I agree that the likely result will be a narrowing of the case. Otherwise the end result could have huge ramifications for the country.

We're writing a rule for the ages,"Justice Neil Gorsuch said. Justice Brett Kavanaugh agreed: "This case has huge implications for the presidency, for the future of the presidency, for the future of the country."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-has-good-day-arguing-immunity-but-that-doesnt-nix-jan-6-prosecution-analysis/ar-AA1nFPxh

Happy Birthday to the best first lady ever

https://teleg.eu/NevsChat/177980

I'm in no way anti-Israel, but this is ridiculous

This "bipartisan" bill that's being introduced proposes to hold back federal funds unless the college or university had an "anti-Semitism" monitor on campus. Hmmm, how about an anti-bully monitor or an anti-rape monitor or an anti-mean-girl monitor. 🤪

There are already civil rights in place for this type of thing. To codify a "monitor" for one specific thing is nuts. Everyone in congress have lost their minds.

https://jewishinsider.com/2024/04/ritchie-torres-mike-lawler-campus-antisemitism-legislation-columbia/

Too many white people want to get on the protest bandwagon, so the protest was cancelled 🤣🤡

https://thefederalist.com/2024/04/26/college-activists-postpone-anti-israel-encampment-because-students-are-too-white/