Forwarded from Steve Laws
This is a list of all the MPs who lobbied to keep the murderer here. The flight also contained rapists, violent criminals and drug dealers.
Ultimately the book stops with the government. They're the ones to blame.
Ultimately the book stops with the government. They're the ones to blame.
Jewish actor complains to Jewish news anchor that to make America great again would be racist. Tiresome.
Forwarded from Steve Laws
The Home Office have put an upper estimate of 85,000 on the number of illegal migrants they expect & will allow to cross The Channel this year.
Ministers are considering extra payments to councils to take migrants as well as identifying up to 10,000 places at former military bases, student accommodation and disused holiday camps.
ANYTHING OTHER THAN DOING WHAT IS REQUIRED TO STOP THE INVASION OF SHORES - TURN BACK THE BOATS!
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2023/02/27/number-channel-migrants-could-hit-85000-year/
Ministers are considering extra payments to councils to take migrants as well as identifying up to 10,000 places at former military bases, student accommodation and disused holiday camps.
ANYTHING OTHER THAN DOING WHAT IS REQUIRED TO STOP THE INVASION OF SHORES - TURN BACK THE BOATS!
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2023/02/27/number-channel-migrants-could-hit-85000-year/
The Telegraph
Number of Channel migrants could hit 85,000 this year
A total of 2,950 people have reached Britain in small boats so far this year, compared with 1,484 in first two months of 2022
Forwarded from Traditional Britain Group
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Katie said something similar to this in a Q&A at our conference some years ago, although it was a little more group specific, less broader based.
I wasn't willing to share at the time (or now), as I didn't want to impede her attempts to earn a living in the US after being thrown out of LBC and the Mail. That's she's repeated a more cautious version here, I thought I'd share this version.
I wasn't willing to share at the time (or now), as I didn't want to impede her attempts to earn a living in the US after being thrown out of LBC and the Mail. That's she's repeated a more cautious version here, I thought I'd share this version.
Forwarded from 💀ʀᴇᴠᴇɴᴀɴᴛ⚡️
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Scott Adams: "Jonathan Greenblatt, I believe... Doesn't he get paid to complain about stuff like this?
If you get paid to look for injustice, how much are you gonna find?"
If you get paid to look for injustice, how much are you gonna find?"
Wesley's Pragmatic Take On The Potential TikTok Ban
TikTok may well get banned in the U.S. however this isn't a particularly positive development, if at all. America's capitalism means some other firm will fill the void that TikTok would leave. Rather than the Chinese harvesting Westerner's data it will be some anti-White big tech firm instead.
The Chinese may well be less likely to remove anti-woke content than American firms thus Chinese ownership could be preferable from the perspective of right-wingers. As Fuentes' points out, anti-woke content often goes viral on TikTok. It is the best platform for disseminating red pills to millions.
TikTok won't become overwhelmingly based though and if it did it would be forced to regulate its content or be outright banned by the mobile app stores.
We also have to ask whether the Chinese would even want their app to become more based than not? China is a geopolitical adversary to the West after all and wokeness is tearing the West apart from within. The Chinese may not want to facilitate the antidotes to their enemy's own poison.
In conclusion neither Chinese or American ownership of TikTok-esque apps is more preferable than the other so the potential ban would be moot.
TikTok may well get banned in the U.S. however this isn't a particularly positive development, if at all. America's capitalism means some other firm will fill the void that TikTok would leave. Rather than the Chinese harvesting Westerner's data it will be some anti-White big tech firm instead.
The Chinese may well be less likely to remove anti-woke content than American firms thus Chinese ownership could be preferable from the perspective of right-wingers. As Fuentes' points out, anti-woke content often goes viral on TikTok. It is the best platform for disseminating red pills to millions.
TikTok won't become overwhelmingly based though and if it did it would be forced to regulate its content or be outright banned by the mobile app stores.
We also have to ask whether the Chinese would even want their app to become more based than not? China is a geopolitical adversary to the West after all and wokeness is tearing the West apart from within. The Chinese may not want to facilitate the antidotes to their enemy's own poison.
In conclusion neither Chinese or American ownership of TikTok-esque apps is more preferable than the other so the potential ban would be moot.
Wesley's Reactionary Take On The Potential TikTok Ban
The number one contention with TiKTok, or similar apps, is the dire fact that it completely fries the brains of the youth; scrambling their neurotransmission system and inducing attention span disorders.
The second contention is that it incentivises the creation and consumption of vapid and insipid content which dumbs down its users and likely turns more people into sexual perverts than based Nationalist chads.
The problem isn't who owns TikTok but instead that the app even exists in the first place.
The number one contention with TiKTok, or similar apps, is the dire fact that it completely fries the brains of the youth; scrambling their neurotransmission system and inducing attention span disorders.
The second contention is that it incentivises the creation and consumption of vapid and insipid content which dumbs down its users and likely turns more people into sexual perverts than based Nationalist chads.
The problem isn't who owns TikTok but instead that the app even exists in the first place.
Whenever people criticise Jews spearheading various social ills Gavin McInnes always pulls his deceitful deflection trope that 'they're just liberal Whites and most of them are atheists'.
His antics on No Chance's channel tonight is a further reminder that he is an immature, spiteful and unscrupulous gatekeeper.
His antics on No Chance's channel tonight is a further reminder that he is an immature, spiteful and unscrupulous gatekeeper.
Forwarded from Tolerant Fellow's Hologram
Gavin McInnes would never be this disrespectful to an Israeli, for whom he says he's prepared to commit genocide. But a fellow Scotsman who wants to attempt a sincere conversation in good faith? Well that's just all in a days work for this shitbag.
https://teleg.eu/NoChanceYT/3181
https://teleg.eu/NoChanceYT/3181
Telegram
No Chance
After kicking Gavin from the Live stream for his retarded unfunny behaviour, he has uploaded our "chat" to his website. He edited out the part where I removed him, he then ranted nonsense for an additional 20mins, claimed him even appearing was "charity"…