The spying regime takes offense at Chinese surveillance.
https://technofog.substack.com/p/shoot-it-down
https://technofog.substack.com/p/shoot-it-down
The Reactionary
Shoot it Down
Spy Balloons and domestic China concerns
You'll want to read this -
How the Biden Administration ordered and executed the destruction of the Nord Stream pipelines.
https://seymourhersh.substack.com/p/how-america-took-out-the-nord-stream
How the Biden Administration ordered and executed the destruction of the Nord Stream pipelines.
https://seymourhersh.substack.com/p/how-america-took-out-the-nord-stream
Substack
How America Took Out The Nord Stream Pipeline
The New York Times called it a “mystery,” but the United States executed a covert sea operation that was kept secret—until now
A heads up on the upcoming "unsealing" of the names of the "John Does" from Ghislaine Maxwell's civil trial.
Typical of the media, there's been a lot of speculation and false hope about what will be revealed. Let's see if we can set the record straight.
For starters, not all of the "John Does" - not even a majority - are alleged to have been part of the Epstein trafficking network. Many are not alleged to have done anything salacious, such as John Doe 118.
And many of the names have already been disclosed, either through media interviews (John Doe 003, John Doe 004, John Doe 008), testimony at Maxwell's criminal trial (John Doe 005), or because their deposition testimony has been released (John Doe 007).
Other names were previously revealed by the media (John Doe 022, John Doe 023, John Doe 110) or are known because they previously investigated Epstein (John Doe 117, John Doe 130). Yet others were unknown to the parties (John Doe 137).
This doesn't mean that there won't be anything of interest. Some of the individuals to be unsealed are alleged to have "engaged in serious wrongdoing", such as John Doe 113 and John Doe 136. I just want to temper expectations, as some are promising things that are not true.
Once the names are unsealed - which may take weeks or a couple months - we will be posting them in detail and explaining what they did and why they matter.
For reference, here's the the list of John Does:
https://www.scribd.com/document/625778440/Doe-List
Typical of the media, there's been a lot of speculation and false hope about what will be revealed. Let's see if we can set the record straight.
For starters, not all of the "John Does" - not even a majority - are alleged to have been part of the Epstein trafficking network. Many are not alleged to have done anything salacious, such as John Doe 118.
And many of the names have already been disclosed, either through media interviews (John Doe 003, John Doe 004, John Doe 008), testimony at Maxwell's criminal trial (John Doe 005), or because their deposition testimony has been released (John Doe 007).
Other names were previously revealed by the media (John Doe 022, John Doe 023, John Doe 110) or are known because they previously investigated Epstein (John Doe 117, John Doe 130). Yet others were unknown to the parties (John Doe 137).
This doesn't mean that there won't be anything of interest. Some of the individuals to be unsealed are alleged to have "engaged in serious wrongdoing", such as John Doe 113 and John Doe 136. I just want to temper expectations, as some are promising things that are not true.
Once the names are unsealed - which may take weeks or a couple months - we will be posting them in detail and explaining what they did and why they matter.
For reference, here's the the list of John Does:
https://www.scribd.com/document/625778440/Doe-List
Scribd
Doe List
The document appears to be a legal case filing that spans 58 pages. It includes a case number, filing date, and page numbers but no other identifiable information about the contents or purpose of the filing.
More details on extracting Epstein's interview from the FBI's grasp. They say production will come.
And - explaining the "John Doe" perpetrators in the Ghislaine Maxwell civil case.
https://technofog.substack.com/p/jeffrey-epstein-update-and-about
And - explaining the "John Doe" perpetrators in the Ghislaine Maxwell civil case.
https://technofog.substack.com/p/jeffrey-epstein-update-and-about
Substack
Jeffrey Epstein Update and about those “John Does”
Details on those to be identified in the Epstein scandal
Forget Kyiv. It's safe. It's become a celebrity hangout. What would take real courage?
A Presidential visit to East Palestine, Ohio -
If only because Biden would be confronted with the failures of his Administration.
https://technofog.substack.com/p/caught-between-toxic-clouds-and-contaminated
A Presidential visit to East Palestine, Ohio -
If only because Biden would be confronted with the failures of his Administration.
https://technofog.substack.com/p/caught-between-toxic-clouds-and-contaminated
The Reactionary
Caught between Toxic Clouds and Contaminated Ground
Visits to Ukraine and Presidential Priorities
We've obtained internal CDC reports on social media COVID-19 "misinformation". Key findings:
CDC officials were flagging truthful content, such as claims that the vaccinated were spreading COVID-19.
Social media keywords like "Medical freedom" and "personal choice" were considered by the CDC to be "Anti-Vax".
https://technofog.substack.com/p/the-cdcs-vaccine-misinformation-list
CDC officials were flagging truthful content, such as claims that the vaccinated were spreading COVID-19.
Social media keywords like "Medical freedom" and "personal choice" were considered by the CDC to be "Anti-Vax".
https://technofog.substack.com/p/the-cdcs-vaccine-misinformation-list
The Reactionary
The CDC's Vaccine "Misinformation" List
The health agency kept tabs on those critical of COVID-19 vaccines
The DC Court of Appeals has upheld the piercing of Trump's attorney-client privilege with his lawyer, Evan Corcoran.
Trump's lawyer is required to produce documents and records to the DOJ. (He'll also likely have to testify before a grand jury.)
This relates to the Special Counsel's investigation into Trump's handling of "classified" documents.
Trump's lawyer is required to produce documents and records to the DOJ. (He'll also likely have to testify before a grand jury.)
This relates to the Special Counsel's investigation into Trump's handling of "classified" documents.
The Trump grand jury in Manhattan "will not meet about the case for the remainder of the week."
The grand jury is expected to reconvene on Monday to "consider the Trump case."
https://abcnews.go.com/US/live-updates/trump-charges/?id=97888515
The grand jury is expected to reconvene on Monday to "consider the Trump case."
https://abcnews.go.com/US/live-updates/trump-charges/?id=97888515
ABC News
Trump indictment: Trump faces some 2 dozen counts, including felonies, sources say
Donald Trump has become the first former U.S. president to be indicted.
They were promised life without constraints. Little did they know that they were being delivered to chains of their own desires.
Donald Trump has been indicted.
"The felony indictment, filed under seal by the Manhattan district attorney’s office, will likely be announced in the coming days."
Our quick analysis:
https://technofog.substack.com/p/nyt-donald-trump-has-been-indicted
"The felony indictment, filed under seal by the Manhattan district attorney’s office, will likely be announced in the coming days."
Our quick analysis:
https://technofog.substack.com/p/nyt-donald-trump-has-been-indicted
The Reactionary
NYT: Donald Trump has been indicted
"Felony charges" still under still seal
When will Trump be arraigned? It looks like Tuesday is the day.
From the New York Times:
“Former President Trump is expected to turn himself in on Tuesday for arraignment on the indictment in State Supreme Court in Manhattan”
From the New York Times:
“Former President Trump is expected to turn himself in on Tuesday for arraignment on the indictment in State Supreme Court in Manhattan”
Trump Indictment.pdf
120.9 KB
The full Trump indictment has been unsealed.
Here it is:
Here it is:
The Manhattan DA suggested Trump was indicted for falsifying business records to conceal NY-level crimes.
This raises an important question -
Why wasn’t Trump charged with those New York State crimes?
https://technofog.substack.com/p/analysis-of-the-trump-indictment
This raises an important question -
Why wasn’t Trump charged with those New York State crimes?
https://technofog.substack.com/p/analysis-of-the-trump-indictment
Substack
Analysis of the Trump Indictment
Curious Omissions from the Manhattan DA
https://technofog.substack.com/p/thank-you-tucker
Tucker did something more important than speaking truth to power. He spoke truth to the powerless.
Tucker did something more important than speaking truth to power. He spoke truth to the powerless.
The Reactionary
Thank you, Tucker
He spoke truth to the powerless
More details concerning Jeffrey Epstein's history with the FBI
Epstein was an FBI source (financial fraud) in 2002 - well before his sweetheart deal from the DOJ.
We have the interview.
And - more info on other Epstein interviews the FBI refuses to release
https://technofog.substack.com/p/confirmed-jeffrey-epsteins-history
Epstein was an FBI source (financial fraud) in 2002 - well before his sweetheart deal from the DOJ.
We have the interview.
And - more info on other Epstein interviews the FBI refuses to release
https://technofog.substack.com/p/confirmed-jeffrey-epsteins-history
Substack
Confirmed: Jeffrey Epstein’s History as an FBI Source
Epstein was an FBI source before his 2007 plea deal